If a studentship is aligned in this way, it should be clear in the case for support and work plan how the work of the student will both contribute to the project and ensure successful completion of the students PhD. We would expect this to form part of the university support letter. Research grants are open to UK higher education institutions, research council institutes, UKRI-approved independent research organisations, Public Sector Research Establishments and NHS bodies with research capacity. Argentina; Bolivia; Brazil; Canada; Chile; Colombia; Costa Rica; Dominican Republic Applicants are required to identify all resources required to successfully accelerate the creation of impact, and to clearly explain the need for these in the justification of resources. The Operations Manager will work closely with Investigators aligned to the NIHR BRC Theme in Infection and AMR (led by Professors Graham Cooke and Wendy Barclay) and will include developing clinical. Position type Full time, fixed term. This will enhance UKRIs ability to report on overseas funding to: It includes any costs incurred by organisations outside the UK, including: The Other-DI Costs document is to contain the following data in the description box in this exact format: Organisation; Country; Cost Category; Cost Description. University of Glasgow - Schools - James Watt School of Engineering whether the applicant has considered responsible innovation in their research programme. CVs, not exceeding two A4 sides each, should be submitted as separate attachments using Attachment Type CV in Je-S, and are only required for named research staff or visiting researchers. 4.9/5. | Learn more about Thomas Kecker's work experience, education, connections & more by visiting their profile on LinkedIn Applicants can use the proposal cover letter to express any other information they feel is relevant to their application. When adding a new proposal you should select: Your application should include the following attachments: You should attach your documents as PDFs to avoid errors. Epsrc.ac.uk. The aim of the scheme is to support them in establishing a research group and developing their own research vision. Operations Manager - Clinical Research | Jobs | Imperial College London EPSRC staff offer their hints and tips on writing strong funding applications and tackle some of the common misconceptions around applying for EPSRC funding. Expression of interest: Human Functional Genomics Initiative clusters Instead, they should describe the impacts on an individuals track record and career development. The studentship should be provided via funding other than the New Investigator Award grant and may be drawn from the universitys doctoral training partnership or centres for doctoral training. . no. CVs are not required for the principal or co-investigators. New Investigator Award - EPSRC - Research Councils UK It is important that EPSRC funds are used ethically and responsibly. To help us with data analysis, do not include the words COV-19, COVID-19 or Coronavirus in the lay summary, technical summary or title sections unless your application relates to proposed research in this area. Hierarchical Deep Representations of Anatomy (HiDRA) - Research Councils UK the application is an invited resubmission. Find out more about the new investigator award expectationsincluding what we are looking for and the support expected from your host organisation. Applicants were not required to include contingency plans for the potential impacts of COVID-19. Submissions to this funding opportunity will count towards the EPSRC repeatedly unsuccessful applicants policy. Scalable fabrication of on-chip Li CO2 batteries for efficient They should be read in conjunction with the reviewer principles. For example, we often have . Does the proposal specify routine and novel ways to engage end users or partners to help realise impacts? Epsrc New Investigator Award Cover Letter. A full justification for your assessment of the application should be included in each section. You can apply for a new investigator award at any time in any field of research relevant to our remit. GTEs will connect directly with the wider Future Observatory: Design the Green Transition programme. Sustainable bio-based materials and manufacture: feasibility study. Reviewers should assess the application based on the criteria listed in the review form on the understanding that EPSRC has accepted the application to the scheme. Apply for funding to initiate or develop new international partnerships with researchers overseas and to tackle the challenges faced by developing countries.. The application you are asked to review includes a case for support. All costs will be funded at 80% of full economic costs. Graduated with a PhD in Mathematics from UCL in 2014, and a Master's in Physics from the University of Hamburg, Germany. CAREER "Utilization of Mechanochemistry for the Minimization of Solvent Waste" National Science . This application is scientifically or technically flawed, This application does not meet one or more of the assessment criteria, This application meets all assessment criteria but with clear weaknesses, This is a good application that meets all assessment criteria but with minor weaknesses, This is a strong application that broadly meets all assessment criteria. Although the majority of the application should lie within EPSRC remit, multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary collaborations with international partners are welcomed. Where the applicants have ticked any boxes confirming that the application involves either animal research or human participation, then you are asked to comment specifically on any ethical considerations and particularly on whether ethical approval procedures have been complied with. The duration of the project should be appropriate to deliver these typically 1 to 3 years. support for postdoctoral research assistant time, a grant for equipment worth more than 20,000. The assessment of the expert panel will be shared with you ahead of the prioritisation meeting. In some instances, the case for support may include a link to a web site containing information on the research proposed. whether the proposal contains a clear vision, addresses a specific challenge or makes a step change in its field, the progress this programme will deliver beyond current state of the art, the intended outputs of the programme, for example, new ideas, tools, techniques, discoveries, and whether these are ambitious but realistic. This funding opportunity has 2 parallel funding routes: This page details the requirements for the open funding route of the funding opportunity. EPSRC Capital Award in Support of Early Career Researchers The new investigator award is for people who hold an academic lectureship position at UK higher education institutions, research council institutes, UKRI-approved independent research organisations and NHS bodies, and have not previously led an academic research group or been the recipient of a significant grant. Select 'call search'. Projects should be self-contained and have a single research vision with clearly defined objectives and outcomes. The case for support should describe the proposed research and its intended outcomes. Include EPSRC ECR International Collaboration Grant open in the subject line. Flexible working includes, but is not limited to, reduction in full-time hours, long-term partial return to work, job sharing, compressed working hours, term-time only working, annualised hours. EPSRC . the project plan and management arrangements for impact, public engagement or responsible innovation, aspects of the project including timing, personnel, skills, budget, deliverables and feasibility, which should be appropriate and proportionate to the scale and complexity of the activity to be undertaken, whether there is clear responsibility for the delivery of each activity or task, whether appropriate resources to deliver the activities been requested and justified. The ESRC New Investigators Grant is a relatively new scheme for early career researchers who want to become a principal investigator (PI) and work on an independent piece of research. To assist the prioritisation panel in reaching their overall conclusion on the application, and to help EPSRC in monitoring the effectiveness of its reviewer selection procedures, you are asked to indicate your confidence in your review. 2021. Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help us test new developments. SFI/FNR/FAPESP lead agency Expression of Interest form - SmartSurvey ID 19673. Particularly with the increased pressures of COVID-19, EPSRC would like to stress to assessors that any cash or in kind support from the university for a grant is regarded as a benefit to building partnerships but is not expected to equate to cash or its equivalent (for example, provision of studentships, secondments, training and access to equipment). For example: The research councils Code of Conduct and policy on the governance of good research conduct outlines the expectation that applicants for research council funding are expected to observe the highest standards of integrity, honesty and professionalism and to embed good practice in every aspect of their work. case for support: eight pages two on your track record and six on the scientific case, CVs: up to two A4 sides each only for named postdoctoral staff, researcher- co-investigators (research assistants who have made a substantial contribution to the proposal and will be employed on the project for a significant amount of time), and visiting researchers, letters of support from all project partners included in the Je-S form: no page limit, quotes for equipment above 25,000: no page limit, equipment business case for any items or combined assets with a value above 138,000: up to two pages, technical assessment for the use of any major facilities listed in Je-S guidance: no page limit, a statement of support from your host research organisation: no page limit. whether the research programme and associated impact activities have been co-designed with external stakeholders or users: Does the proposal include objectives for impact related activities and are they appropriate to the research? Finally the presentation will ask how organisations such as FIG and ISPRS can play a part in these developments. This award enables researchers to develop flexible, creative and tailored approaches to increase the impact of their research by building new or developing existing partnerships locally and across the . For multidisciplinary proposals please state which aspects of the proposal you feel qualified to assess, contributes to or helps maintain the health of other disciplines, contributes to addressing key UK societal challenges, contributes to future UK economic success and development of emerging industry or industries, meets national needs by establishing or maintaining a unique world-leading activity, complements other UK research funded in the area, including any relationship to the EPSRC portfolio, plans for dissemination and knowledge exchange with potential beneficiaries of the research, appropriateness of the track record of the applicant or applicants, unique and complementary contribution and expertise of the international partner or partners, appropriateness of the plans for developing the collaborative relationship with the international partner or partners, balance of skills of the project team, including collaborators, the level of the contribution made to this award from other sources including the UK institutions and international potential partners, any equipment requested, or the viability of the arrangements described to access equipment needed for this project, and particularly on any university or third-party contribution, any resources requested for activities to either increase impact, for public engagement or to support responsible innovation. EPSRC does not assess the presence or value of any matched funding provided by the university before making a funding decision. Standard letters declaring general support for a project are often criticised by reviewers. You should ensure you are aware of and follow any internal institutional deadlines that may be in place. Acceptance to the New Investigator Award scheme is judged by EPSRC before the application is sent to expert peer review and is made on the basis of the content of the cover letter and the level of resources requested in the application. Posts responsible for: None. Smaller items of equipment (individually under 10,000) should be in the Directly Incurred Other Costs heading. how the proposed research contributes to or helps maintain the health of other research disciplines, contributes to addressing key UK societal challenges, contributes to current or future UK economic success or enables future development of key emerging industries, the extent to which the research proposed has the potential to meet national strategic needs by establishing or maintaining a unique world-leading research activity (including areas of niche capability). You must apply using the Joint Electronic Submission system (Je-S) . The new target requires the UK to bring all greenhouse gas emissions to net-zero by 2050. The justification of resources, taking up to two A4 sides, should explain the necessity of your requested resources to your research project, including implementing the Impact Plan. . The aim of the scheme is to support them in establishing a research group and developing their own research vision. yBirgit van Huijgevoort and Soe Haesaert are with the Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands zOliver Schon and sadegh Soudjani are with Newcastle University, United Kingdom The reviewer form asks reviewers to summarise their view of the application. For sensitive information the applicant should state clearly whether the information is confidential. Working within the project team for the EPSRC project "Linking formation mechanisms, nanostructure and function in metal oxide nanosheets using multimodal characterisation" (EP/W026937/1). Where two or more applications have been formally linked to form a single research project, you are requested to submit a single review covering the project as a whole. We recommend you start your application in good time. Universities may wish to support applicants through allocation of a PhD student. Researchers at UCL and University of Ghana have successfully predicted whether children have anaemia using only a set of smartphone images. Place Based Impact Acceleration Account - Swindon - NERC - the Natural This must be attached, as a single document, using the Case for Support attachment type in the Joint Electronic Submission (Je-S) system. You should indicate those aspects that you accorded higher or lower priority and why. This should be coupled with sufficient provision from their host institution to ensure a boost to career development and the underpinning support to establish the applicant within their research field and develop their independent research vision. Note that the existence of competing groups elsewhere should not of itself be seen as a reason for downgrading a proposal. Customer Reviews. Information provided as part of the intention to submit will not formally assessed. For equipment in the range 25,000 to 138,000, quotations obtained verbally are acceptable and should be detailed in the proposal. DOCX BBSRC - mlw.mw The following information takes an ESRC Standard Grant application as a template but the information is also applicable to other funders. comment on the effectiveness of the proposed planning and management, and on whether the requested resources are appropriate and have been fully justified. Acceptance to the New Investigator Award scheme is judged by EPSRC before the application is sent to expert peer review and is made on the basis of the content of the cover letter and the level of resources requested in the application. Therefore, you should not use journal impact factor (or any hierarchy of journals), conference rankings and metrics such as the H-index or i10-index when assessing UKRI grants. Applications will only be assessed by 1 panel. The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) is introducing the new scheme following a recent review of First Grants. We process and handle personal information according to these regulations. Principal Investigator . Where applicants wish to include details on flexible working or a career break for reviewers to take into account in their assessment, they are not required to explain the personal circumstances that resulted in the need for this. Three quotations for any equipment costing more than 25,000 should accompany the proposal. It is particularly important therefore that the panel have clear advice on the merits of each component. whether the applicant has demonstrated that the research is timely what would happen if they didnt undertake this research now? F.D.G. You should comment on how well this has been done and on the appropriateness of the resources requested. meet the eligibility criteria of EPSRC New Investigator Award (NIA) scheme. Complex, multi-faceted research projects with many objectives are not appropriate for this scheme. letters of support from all project partners included in the Je-S form (no page limit), technical assessments for facilities listed as requiring one in the Je-S guidance (no page limit), host organisation letter of support (2 pages), cover letter (optional attachment, no page limit, not seen by peer review). Typical examples are the production of ammonia, which is a process that needs to be catalysed by iron, or the production . We expect the proposed collaborative project to present a balance between partnership building activities and direct research, as appropriate, considering the key objectives of the funding opportunity.